
Originally Posted by
Consider Phlebitis
Banks decision not to have his books translated into Hebrew is a sad choice - a kind of senseless exclusion of a group of people who share a language. This does not mean they share any belief, or have the same skin color, or anything else in common. It is unfortunate that Banks stoops to such a generalization. Perhaps Americans should boycott English authors, movies, music, etc. as an objection (certainly justified) to British Petroleum's destruction of a chunk of that country - devastating its people, their natural resources, and their livelihood. Ridiculous???
Long live Elton John!
I find almost everything you've said here utterly perplexing. Taking each bit of confusion in order:
Did Iain say he didn't want his books translated into Hebrew? I thought he asked his agent not to do deals with Israeli publishers. Not the same thing, is it?
This slippage (between language and country) is even more confusing in your example of Americans boycotting English authors. If you mean English language authors, then there is at least one rather obvious problem. If you mean authors who are English (a category which does not include Banks), then I'm not sure why. BP, to the extent that it has anything to do with the UK as a country any more, is related to the whole country of Britain, not exclusively to England. This may seem like a minor quibble, but it matters rather a lot to the non-English members of the UK and justifiably so.
BP is not commensurate with the British state. The Israeli armed forces most certainly are commensurate with the Israeli state.
BP is responsible for the most shocking negligence, casual disregard for environmental and humanitarian consequences, and the selfish placement of profiteering above ethics. All of which, incidentally, the US government was happy to support when it meant more and cheaper oil. The Israeli state sent armed soldiers onto ships carrying aid supplies to an area that it has been systematically and intentionally cutting off from the rest of the world causing the deaths of no-one knows how many people and the misery of many more. These two issues are both horrific, but they are horrific in their specificity. To try to compare them in the way you have is naive at best.
Far more importantly than any of my other queries though is this: what has Elton John got to do with any of it!?
Last edited by Tangendentalism; 19-06-2010 at 11:08 AM.
Reason: beligerent typos
In the end, nothing you do matters; all that matters is what you do.